This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.
0:00 So now the is referring over here to the Torah says creepy crawly things. So we'll say when so now the when it says which is an extra that what does that what does that extra teach us that comes to include the juices the gravy and the keep. Well, say we already defined these terms, right? Their means 0:31 the juice which oozes out of it. The ka refers ultimately again as the gim said before to the to the fat which comes out of it and the and the the refers to the dregs from it. So say so therefore again within not only not only is it the sher itself which becomes tame but any of these ancillary parts 0:54 becomes as well to which the says lali ligmarani why didn't separate Russia for why can't I learn from what from the from say from and of because remember again all three of those cases teaching that what that the liquid that comes from these items has the same status as the primary item. 1:19 So say just like by the liquid has the same status as the primary item. So by the liquids that come out have the same status as the primary item. Why do why do I need a separate to which I'll tell you why? 1:37 Because had the Torah not stated this explicitly by I would have thought that even let's say you learned out from let's say from so or from I would have thought it's fine but then has the same as the place from where it's derived namely what they say just like you only 2:05 or If you eat a so you're also what if you eat and say we know what's and in fact that's not the case by there's an interesting that says that what you're even by what even by right they will say a sher is a you can have a 2:31 sher that's the size a tiny a tiny size and yet again you're still for that I have. So if that's the case, so let the Torah just state and what they must say ultimately again if that's the case just write that even the liquids that comes from a has the status ultimately again of the same solid item and learn out these 2:58 other items from now if you look at Rashi for just a moment Rashi says So I just want to point out by even if you have a sharet the size of anasha the size of a lentil the truth is even smaller again that sherets ultimately will be asser so therefore again say something very interesting I can't do not from one 3:31 of the three items mentioned before from from the veil of from say those are all but areas if I would have thought that is also only therefore going to have to state separately says the okay I'll turn the question around why don't we learn all of those items out from lets be the 3:57 primary then we have another problem. What's the other problem ultimately again because I could say that their remember again so remember again what that means is says listen to this we know that when we say what that means is shar has to be intact. But if that shar is even a very 4:34 very very small it conveys say if you're going to learn out everything else from then what you're going to learn out that is also going to be that'll be a significant but that which we learned. 4:55 So let's just go through these items. So we know ultimately again untithe produce grain before you bring the carbon consecrated property is produce forbidden mixtures all of these items say what's all of these say the liquids which comes from these items has the same status as 5:22 the primary item to which the says say now is pointing out is it seems to be that we have redundant. What do we just get finished? What do we spend the whole days a whole on proving that what that when it comes to and what's their liquids have the same status as the solid forms. Now what you're telling 5:51 me again is what what o the says Their liquids have the same status as the primary form. Wh why do I have to keep making the same? Why don't they just say why don't they just go ahead and why they need to make a separate why not just learn from and I don't have to make a separate 6:23 because there's a difference say why we say ultimately again ultimately in all of these other cases will say in In the case of in the case of in in the previous cases these are she says so I say ultimately again these are all that come on their own to which the says so say this only teaches me that this is 7:03 true by that comes on its own. How do I know that the liquid has the same status as the primary solid item if the does not come on its own? But ultimately we learn out from saysim is not an ism we really mean a status. 7:25 It's not a status that comes on its own. Rashi says actually very interesting is actually very interesting when that fruit grows on the tree it's not automatically user it's not means it's not automatically when does it become burim only once it's picked it's very interesting only once it's picked and designated as bikurim does it becomes 7:50 does it become say how do I know that this applies to bikurim actually very interesting because it says that you have to bring a pre so what does that teach me I bring a pre but I don't bring a mashka I don't bring liquids so I say it's actually very interesting which means as follows if you go ahead and you picked grapes let's say and you pressed the grapes into wine 8:21 you do not bring that wine as bikurim now we're going to discuss when you do bring the wine, the grape juice as but for now what that means is if you harvested the grapes and you press them you do not bring that as now watch this on both say how do I know however if I brought grapes and then they were pressed then ultimately again that all 8:46 goes as to which the says ultimately again the posit says He says the word is extra and therefore teaches me that that which is pressed from the grapes is brought as well. So now we seem to have two contradictory statements. On one hand you just told me that if I pick the grapes, press them, I don't bring the wine. And then you just told me that 9:15 ultimately again if I brought the grapes and then press them, I do bring them as be. So we're going to discuss when this is true in just a moment. chicken but ultimately again I could say I will say that when it comes to ultimately require there's a recitation of that is necessary when you bring the to the mdash 9:41 and they require placement before the coen so maybe I can't use them as a source rather again I can learn from where from chuma how do I know from chumai that that liquids that come from Truma have the same status as Truma. 10:02 Truma is compared to and just like liquids which come from the solid ultimately again have the same status as the solid. So that is when the truma of your hands but when it comes to what's the if you intentionally if a noncoin intentionally eats say that is punishable by death right and unintentionally you have to pay back the 10:31 chuma plus a penalty fifth rather for both of them together. one second both have what if you if a noncoin eats them intentionally and unintentionally you have to pay back the principle plus plus a rather that the liquid has the same status as 10:59 the solid from and from one other case right excuse me Say we have three different cases learn from true one other one other say but that which we learned tomorrow we're holding right now we're holding right now is even though it looks like we have multiple drills which are all saying the same thing what becomes 11:31 abundantly clear is that each of these cases has their own unique peculiar aspects and therefore again that that that peculiarity or uniqueness prevents it from being learned out from the other. So in learned out and of we learned that each of those 11:54 items are dissimilar from one another and therefore cannot be learned out from each other on B. Now we have kadesh hectish kilim each of them ultimately again will be unique on their own as well. We now also saw that what truma bikurim are also unique on their own. 12:16 Interestingly enough they all share the same common characteristic which is that their liquids have the same status as their solid forms. That's that's that's what we're seeing over here. But again, what's what's incredibly amazing about this is all the same their liquids have the same status as their solid forms, but yet for some reason because the each 12:39 have some type of uniqueness, we cannot learn them out one from the other. So we'll say now says tomorrow something very interesting says right honey that comes from dates apple cider right wine that comes from apple cider says that's very interesting winter grapes so 13:10 we'll say apparently winter grapes never matured in order to produce wine So what did you do with winter grapes? You made vinegar from it. Made vinegar from it. So winter grapes. I'm sorry. I should say means the vinegar from winter grapes say for that matter any other types of chuma fruits. So, so what's 13:35 says if you notice again excluded from this situation or excluded from this list are grapes and olives for reasons you'll see in just a momentum any of the types of chuma fruits say now remember what's happening over here say you are you are going ahead and eating the liquids of a Truma fruit either again I have 14:04 Truma dates and I'm consuming the honey. I have Truma apples and I'm consuming the cider. I have Truma winter grapes and I'm consuming the vinegar. So it say so what's the if I consume the liquid form of these items it says if you did it if you ate if I'm at I'm going to be for the principle plus which means what means what what is essentially saying what does that mean 14:29 if I'm what does that mean it has the status of truma the liquid form has the status of the solid form has status of truma potter says I'm potter why am I potter Why my ultimately again because the liquid form does not have the status of the solid form. But my let's analyze this. What are they arguing about 14:57 say watch this? They are arguing really over an exegetical principle. The say now watch this. Now what the is really asking is as follows. What the is asking is why is this aus? Because didn't we just get finished saying what? 15:12 Didn't we just get finished saying that when it comes to when it comes to truma? So when it comes to truma, the liquid form of truma has what? Has what? >> Has the same status as the solid form. 15:27 So why is this even a discussion? We already just got finished saying this. The liquid form has the same status as the solid form. So what's happening over here? What's the makus? to which the says there's an exogetical saying now this happens to be fascinating. So this say is we've seen this many many times throughout so say now watch this what it says as follows when you learn out when you 15:53 learn out B from A is the source B is the derivative so do we say that when B is learned out from A so B is like A in every way or do we say no that when you learn out from B from you you isolate the core principle from A but now B is but then the rest of B is learned out from the other identity of B. We'll say in a simpler way is when you learn out B 16:19 from A. Do we say that B resembles A in every single way or that no B resembles A in a particular way but said then we go and develop the unique characteristics of B on its own. See here we go. So will say that when you learn out from B from A, you learn out B from A in every way. 16:44 So let's remember again just like when it comes to ultimately again liquid that comes from the solid has the same status as the solid. So to ultimately again truma the liquid that comes out from Truma ultimately again has a setup of Truma. 17:05 And then we go learn out and we learn out from again just like applies to all items, right? All items. So to ultimately again refer to other items, not just grapes and not just olives but to other items as well. 17:24 Therefore even the liquids of these secondary items the liquid will have the same status as the primary item. And therefore again will say that if you drink that if you ingest the liquid of what? If you ingest the liquid of the of the date honey of the apple cider of the vinegar holds. 17:51 So listen to this. So just like picurim ultimately remember so learning a truma from pikim like we said before just like pikurim liquid that comes from the fruit has the same status of the fruit so liquid which comes from the fruit has the status of the fruit as well or actually they change change it to say just like liquids 18:23 that are sanctified as truma say what type of liquids are sanctified as Truma in when it comes to Truma liquids. What kind what kind of liquids have Truma sanctity? It's only wine and olive oil. But other liquids do not have truma sanctity. 18:47 So say that when it comes to other liquids which ooze from it is only it is only what? It is only wine and olive oil. But no other liquid has the same identity as the solid for true purposes. Therefore again say therefore this second Yeshua will therefore say that the honey the apple cider and the vinegar does not have truma sanctity. 19:10 Therefore if a non ingests it he will not be at all the therefore suggesting that is of an exegetical nature. It is a question of how far you go ahead and you take the comparison but one second that which we learned that's what you do not bring 19:38 liquid right in you don't bring you don't bring the juices of asur to the says only that which oozes from the grapes and from the olives money who is Does that reflect? Oh, that's he is the one who will say ultimately so he'll subscribe to the princ and ultimately again he learned from 20:11 and say that which and he who said or that which says that you do not get 40 malus because of Allah that was when it comes Arla. If you eat ara or I should say if you eat liquid of ara you eat the juices that come out of ara fruit you do not get malus unless of course you eat the juices of olives and 20:33 grapes money say whose opinion does that reflect Rabbi Yeshua that is Rab Yeshua who holds the he say who says that ultimately learn out from the derivative but yet establish right learn from the source but establish a derivative in its place in other words don't learn all from the source He learns out the top of 21:00 prem and then ultimately again he goes and learns out the exv of pre pre from all right we'll have to stop over here we'll expound this a bit more
Expand transcript 2,737 words
43:04Interactive Daf
42:40
43:52Interactive Daf
40:46Interactive Daf
42:03
42:10
36:11
42:00
