This transcript is auto-generated and may contain errors.
0:00 He went to Rebei and Rebei told him to take a bird and essentially she the bird over the flax pool. 0:06 The moths will be repelled or repulsed by the smell of the blood and will leave the flax alone. 0:12 So if you remember again the gimar said how could Rebi tell him to do that? 0:15 After all we learned that if you shack an animal and you need the blood you're still how but you would not be able to do under these circumstances. 0:25 So we have two different versions in the story. 0:28 So one version said according to he said you're right said say make the bird a trai and raven said the second version said that rebi said stab the animal right choke it out choke out the animal that way again you 0:47 know that way it'll die without without and won't be in so we're trying to figure out the nature of these different opinions it says my according to the opinion who says that to go ahead and trafe up the make the 1:06 animal first before why didn't he just tell to choke the animal or to stab the animal I don't and therefore won't be because maybe you'll say that opinion holds that there is no for a bird and maybe again therefore if 1:26 there's No for a bird said then maybe the stabbing of the bird is the equivalent of himself said. 1:42 So that mob was commanded that by you have to the windpipe and the esophagus and a majority of one by a bird and the majority of top you're right which say remember again means you don't have to say this and 2:05 certainly this so certainly again it goes without saying that if Ifi were to go and to stab or to choke the bird that's not a at all and certainly would not engender the obligation or not create the obligation for about 2:25 but to make the animal a maybe say that ultimately again is a And maybe therefore it should require therefore again says that no father and it was according to the opinion who said that to go stab the animal. 2:58 Why didn't he tell him to go and make the animal the so maybe you'll say because he holds that that's unfit is still called the but yet again we learned before that what except the opin that when it comes to 3:27 and in In fact he codified this opinion by calling it the wording of the to which the says in reality I will say again once again we have l of say means you don't have to say this and certainly this so 3:48 we'll say goes without saying what if you go ahead and as if you say that rebi told him to go out to make the animal a trade that is not about but had he told him to stab the animal right 4:04 or to choke the animal I might have thought that maybe again this is an issue that there is no for and therefore again the stabbing of the animal or the choking of the animal that's the therefore and therefore that that is 4:25 not the Therefore we'll say ultimately again therefore the says that okay asks as follows. 4:39 So bottom line bottom line although we have a mlo as to what exactly was said bottom line is that essentially go ahead and kill the burden away that's not kill the burden away that's not and if it's not if there's 4:54 no then there is no obligation of the only time you have an obligation for the dam of an o is when there was proper for the oita no so the say now as An interesting question. 5:15 This is actually quite beautiful. 5:16 But tell me, do moths attack flax in does that even happen? 5:31 I will say when the Jews of Bal came back. 5:42 So this is actually quite amazing. 5:43 When the pious Jews of Bavl came back so is actually quite amazing. 5:49 So Zikin are meteors. 5:51 The meteors Zos Rashi says are earthquakes. 5:55 Ru's strong winds, thunder. 6:01 Apparently, again, these dramatic weather events or meteorological events stopped. 6:08 The wine stopped souring and ultimately again their flaxs their flax stopped getting ruined. 6:19 And I say the rabbis attributed this to the and his sons who came from Babel Teris. 6:25 So says isn't this amazing of and his sons ultimately what happened all of these detrimental events stopped happening in yet what is the saying yet the saying over that flax flax was getting ruined by moth so what's going on over 6:43 is actually amazing to which the says was beneficial for who for everyone else but his did not work for him. 6:58 So we'll say so saved everyone else's flax. 7:03 Whose flax did it not save? 7:06 It didn't save his own say this is a dramatic imra say every single day a heavenly voice comes out and says the entire world is sustained in the in the merit of my son and say ultimately again my Khan sorry 7:36 sorry not excuse me and right the whole world is sustained because of my sons and for my sons my sons it's enough for him to eat a of carobs may shabas the shabas so ultimately again so what do you see 8:00 again an entire world is sustained an entire world is sustained ultim Ultimately and my sons is sustained through again a of each and every week say which tells you what so the Gimar is using as an example of someone whose 8:19 merit benefits everyone else but yet he himself doesn't really partake of that very same merit but say what's the lesson the lesson is that sometimes sometimes the piety and the holiness that we generate ultimately again benefits the world even if 8:38 we are not the direct beneficiaries of it. 8:41 Isn't that amazing that sometimes again very that we generate don't benefit us but benefit the world around us. 8:50 This is an incredible lesson and I think this happens we experience this very often in the world of as well. 8:56 Sometimes we daven for something and we don't get what we davenin for. 9:01 But lest you think that because we don't get what we dav in for ouros failed. 9:06 It's not true. There's no such thing as an empty prayer. 9:09 There's no such thing as a failed prayer. 9:12 Every single thing we d for yields positive results. 9:15 Just sometimes it doesn't yield the positive results we wanted. 9:19 Sometimes it does didn't yield the positive results ultimately again that we asked for that we desired. 9:25 But ultimately again those positive results are always there. 9:30 In the same way that bends only got a kuinia's flax was attacked yet helped for everyone else's flax and bends helped to sustain the world. 9:44 Incredible. So, so just to close out this remember again says over here in this case in just pull this up. 10:02 Give me a second. 10:06 So the says as follows if one and ultimately again the is invalid right the animal turns into an aa so what happens oh says or you go ahead and you and it turns out that the animal is aos ultimately again 10:26 you are from so what you begin to see is what that the mitzvah of only applies to a regular act of if you do not if the if your act does not result in a bonafide then again there is no 10:45 good so I'll say ultimately again like who really identifies as in this particular circumstance beautiful animal and others see the so remember again this goes back to the first in the so what's ideally we don't want to but if it's 11:14 if there are other people standing on top of the and ultimately again witness the will be good so says so these things kind of go hand in hand if the is good then by definition then by definition there is A 11:35 mitzvah of there is a mitzvah ultimately again to cover the blood. 11:41 However, again if they go ahead and what they go ahead and meaning without oversight then ultimately because we assume the was not good and therefore again as we just said before the is not good there is no of so to 12:03 again right in a case say of the mother and the So we'll say same same thing if we see let's say of a and they sh the mother if other people see the therefore again telling us that the is a valid 12:26 one therefore you can't she the offspring in that type of situation we'll say what happens if on their own without oversight mayor So says such a is not good and therefore again you could check let's say for example the daughter 12:46 afterwards and ultimately again say that it is but they agree say the who say that it's will hold that in this type of circumstance if they did she will not get malus okay so say here we go say it's a 13:07 fundamental issue so So the essentially the Mishna is telling me is that if there's oversight on their will be good as you saw in the first Mishnah the extension of that is that if people saw the people monitor the then 13:27 if people oversaw the then ultimately again there would be a den of osb what happens if right now interestingly In the case of Rabbi Mayor ultimately says that it's the offspring afterwards and will say that it's so we'll say that's 13:48 the point picks up on overn which says says essentially the were concerned that if we say that the that the is a proper kisu then what people ultimately will go ahead and people will go ahead and say that the food 14:25 is fit for consumption the is good to which the says But you could say the same thing by the second part of the say which is what which is that if you say that you could sh the mother after the 14:42 daughter that would also tell us I'm sorry just the opposite if you say that it's user to the mother the daughter after you checked the mother people will say the of the mother was a proper to which the says to 14:59 which the says No, no, no. 15:00 If the shacked the mother and you refrain from shacking the daughter, people won't come to say that the was good. 15:08 Rather, they'll just say that you didn't want the meat. 15:13 But you can say the same thing by the beginning of the Mishna ultimately again you could say that what why did he cover up the blood? 15:21 Because he wanted to wanted to go ahead and clean up his courtyard. 15:27 to which the Garra says but if that's the case that works fine meaning that works fine if you'reing let's say in your house right or in a place of habitation if you're in the garbage dump where you don't have to 15:38 clean up everything what is there to say so the says similar again if he comes to ask the you have to rule decisively what would you say so according to that logic you can say the same thing in the safer 15:54 case what happens if he comes That's the shining you have to rule decisively rather say the says as follows both say in reality argue in all of these cases right both say both cases are name is the same there are 16:18 two cases in the cases right right the first case is second case is the cases are the same in the Both cases have two parts. 16:28 In part one of the case, someone is overseeing the of the what happens if someone is overseeing the what's the status of the is good. 16:39 If the is good then what? 16:42 and the prohibition of Soviet espos sets in what happens if someone is not overseeing the so we'll say here we have the according to the ultimately say um I'm sorry according to according yeah according to according to rabbi mayor raime 17:02 mayor says the if somebody's not overseeing the then the is [clears throat] not good therefore again you would be putter from covering the blood and putter from o so espino No argue on both cases and we'll say even if someone's not 17:17 looking right it's not over you're still in and so the says I why don't argue on the as well the rabbis argue in both cases mayor So I say the answer is draon have good midos and what do they do? 17:46 They wait to argue until when? 17:48 Until rabi mayor finishes speaking. 17:50 So first right the finishes out both cases according to mayor and only then do the weigh in. 17:59 So say I understand the so say even in cases where no one is monitoring overseeing right the we still have to treat it therefore we're going to make them so mayor my time say what's what's logic for being so say the 18:28 is as follows that mayor [snorts] ultimately again said that because of so we'll say so what what does that mean so we'll say ultimately again that the majority of the times that do something it's right the majority the ro is 18:57 that they botch things in general they batch things say they don't they don't have das they don't have das therefore again the assumption is therefore applying that to we make the general assumption that they don't know what to do for 19:13 so because they don't know what to do for therefore we assume the is invalid so soap Ro say the truth is you don't even need to say you don't even have to say majority of time botches stuff up rather again even 19:42 if you say even if you say a minority of the time they botch things up we still won't treat their as good why not mayor himself is for a first look at Rashi my say even if you say that the 20:02 majority of times does do things correctly and only a minority of the time do they mess things up we would still consider to be an available say because that's number one right and what happens go ahead and combine the mut 20:24 is to the minority of the mess stuff up. 20:28 Combine that with the say what's the of the is that say the is what is that it's right the of the it's alive if it's alive then is of so take the mute the mute is the minority of the time 20:47 and mess stuff up combine that with of the ruba and say what does that do that goes and chips dips away and ultimately diminishes or takes away the impact of the ro. 21:04 So this is amazing. 21:05 So the said the reason why when do unsupervised that it's going to be an is because the majority of times they batch stuff up. 21:17 The says even if you don't say that even if you only say the minority of the time they botch stuff up the will still be unavail stuff up take that attach it to the what's the or I should say write 21:42 a take the attach it And say what does that do? 21:48 That fundamentally undermines the ro and therefore tells you that the animal will be to which the says here we go is a fascinating case you find a baby you find a baby sitting by the side of dough and ultimately again 22:11 he's holding a piece of dough in his hands. 22:14 So we'll say what's so says it's so will say the is and ultimately say that the is why it's the normal way of children to play in garbage dumps and what are you going to find in a garbage dump this 22:34 is tamuric times kids are much low lowmaintenance children right what do you find in a garbage dump dead rodents right so and what do you do when you find the dead rodent you you play with So say so what happens? 22:45 So therefore again children we we assume so and say what happens say and what happens. 22:56 So ultimately again so let's put all this together plays in the ash. 23:01 Therefore we assume he touched a rodent. 23:03 There's a piece of dough in his hand. 23:05 We assume where did that piece of dough come from? 23:08 The big dough right? 23:09 The big dough. And therefore we assume that's what he touched the dough. 23:12 Therefore, what the do will be to what's logic. 23:20 Why does hold that the do is going to be going to be mut or going to be to which the gimar says he holds that the majority of the majority of children play around in the garbage dump but a minority 23:35 does not therefore we'll say what should you do take the mute what's the mute Take the ultimately again of the who don't play in the garbage dump. 23:54 Go ahead and combine that with the of the which is the and it chips away ultimately again at the rove of Tino. 24:04 It chips away at the ro ultimately again of the children who are Tommy. 24:09 So we'll say so again something amazing happens over here which is that you begin to see you begin to see Rabi Mayor's of ultimately going ahead taking taking the going ahead and combining it with a and a together with fundamentally 24:30 erodess the ro so says so I'll say ultimately again If if they said that a suff ultimately again will create will we see a suffic to which they may ultimately again what do you begin to see that like and also 25:00 like so the sh is which one that's nice that that rebi Pasin like both say that leaves us with a fundamental shil which is but who did he paskin with last remember again and raime and do not agree with each 25:19 other it's a so remember again both this is the fundamental issue in our mishna [snorts] about what you do with an unsupervised rab says the is totally not good totally not good therefore again of no of and say yes there 25:43 is of and of so now we have rebi kind of going on record pastoring like both but which one was the latter of to which the says here we goshi sorry tells a story that one Rabi and Rabi Z were 26:08 in the marketplace of and they were standing at the entrance way of the base. 26:16 So Rabi came out and he found them said to them and I told you many times when the Bish is in session do not stand outside of the Bish. 26:29 Right? when we're learning in the base, don't stand outside because maybe someone's going to need you. 26:38 I'm sorry because maybe we're going to need you to weigh in on some type of discussion and you're not going to be there. 26:47 No one's going to know where you are and people are going to make mistakes. 26:51 Went inside the base did not go in. 26:56 So the following question came up say who who did hold like in the latest iteration or in the last iteration of the Mishna like mayor said had you told me about this before you didn't give me a chance to ask 27:17 the elder says had you told me this question while I was still standing outside with Rabi Aba I could have asked him this question why why says heard this from his father and his and his father would have heard it 27:44 directly from for because father ultimately again went ahead and reviewed his learning every 30 days. 28:01 Okay. Okay. So, so bottom line sent word to the diaspora mayor ultimately again like mayor the but yet he also passed like ultimately again rather what do you see from here that this was letter says take a look at just 28:28 a moment mayor. So apparently both say rather it appears that reb's last was in accordance with mayor and not like and both say that is indeed what is codified by the so remember again the is actually the same it's actually 28:53 the same as we quoted before the And what happened? 29:10 No one else oversaw the say we assume that an unsupervised by is in fact what is in fact considered to be an invalid and therefore again will be from we see that indeed we pasin like rabi mayor against the beautiful 29:39 let's go writer say here we go. 29:43 You 100 animals in one place. 29:46 Busy day. 100 animals in one place, right? 29:50 Say the point the mission is making over here is that what you could essentially in rapid succession and just do one act of when you finishing. 30:02 If you go and you shack 100 of in one place same thing say one act of works for all of them say is actually interesting what happens if you and an o so we'll say up until now we're dealing with 30:16 sheing a whole bunch of the same men a bunch of kios a bunch of what happens if you and an o at once so you could still do one for both says Huda disagrees and he says no we'll say if 30:35 you're shing and then what those two things require two separate two I should say two separate here we go right I'm sorry so we'll say so again what direction over here is the word the word can be understood meaning everything 31:03 although it sounds like the singular say sometimes in biblical Hebrew the singular can include a larger group as well therefore in the Torah says means even if you're shing many ultimately again you could go ahead and cover many with one 31:18 so based on the structure we said that even if you again 100 in one place, one suffices for everything. 31:36 If you went ahead and you 100 birds in one place ultimately again one suffices for them all say first wide line. 31:50 Similarly, if you went ahead and you in one place one is sufficient no disagrees. 32:02 He says no. If you sh the and then you're going to sh you do cover up the blood and only then should you subsequently she the oath and then cover the blood after that. 32:16 O as well say is based on the fact that the P says. 32:21 So the PK itself distinguishes between a and between an O. 32:28 But they said to him yet the Pik says but ultimately again the P says because the nephesh literally again the life of every flesh its blood is in its life or nephesh. 32:45 So we'll say so what what what is what does this mean? 32:48 Remember again is clear says the fact that the says o the rabbis responded to they said what does that mean this is what you're to teach me that what you could and suffice it with one you could check 100 of 33:14 and take care of it with one if you'reing a kayo or an oath then what each of those require their own subject their own different respond they say no they so say they say ultimately what you that is already taken 33:34 that say teaches me a different say what does the mean see without that o I would have thought as Rashi points out if you look at the e o So I would have thought without the O I would have thought 33:53 that only applies when when you have both a and an oath. 34:00 But o comes along to teach me that what even if I only have or an oath that also goes ahead and triggers an obligation of which will say he says no no no I agree with that premise that of course it's 34:17 either or you don't need both but what I can learn that out ultimately again from the word we say damo is possessive from its blood so you have to cover the blood of the kay or the blood of the off 34:29 you don't need both rather the of one triggers the obligation >> ultimately again according to ultimately again that has a connotation of many so that the word damo teaches me that what even if I have many bloods right which means what 34:58 even if I have the bloods of andos together. 35:02 I can still do one ultimately again for both of those things. 35:09 So we have a so let's go with what everybody agrees with everyone agrees with 100 of how many kis do you need one 100 behemos how many do you need one what happens if it's a and that's the case you 35:23 have ra ultimately telling me I'm sorry the telling me telling me that ultimately again I only need one act of covering and I have telling me that we need two different acts of covering say interestingly enough says that even is 35:47 actually quite interesting even who says that you require a separate act of for the blood of a and the blood of an oath will hold that you don't need to make another of saying this is quite interesting what this is 36:02 saying over here we're going to stop in a moment say what this is saying over here is that as follows Who is of the opinion who says that you can't do one act of therefore say what has to happen say what 36:22 I would have thought was when I and I do that's a half then when I go ahead and I what do I have to do I have to make another say that that is not the case that according to the 36:36 is that one of suffices. 36:39 You make a brah of let's say on the even though you do the even though you do the afterwards you do not need to make a second on the rather that first covers everything. 36:50 So the say why the difference than the teaching of the listen they're once sitting in the was standing above them they said to him so they're sitting and they're having a suda and say you know what let's bench And then 37:20 what happened like what happens often in a suda someone opened another good bottle of wine said hey you know what before we bench there's always time for right that's fine but so say so remember again once you say let's bench 37:42 say let's bench means what the meal is over once the meal is over then what don't get nervous, you could still drink, right? 37:52 But what you have to make another braha. 37:55 So say so what do you see from here? 37:57 Once you conclude suggesting the same way that once you can say let's let's bench right the is over you have to make a bra. 38:03 So so to again when you and you now engage in the mitz of that act of is over which means when you subsequently sh the what should you have to do? 38:13 What should you have to do? 38:14 You shall have to make another Once you go ahead and what you or you and you do the act of has come to a conclusion which means that when you engage in the subsequent act of you should have to what 38:31 have to make a new say here's the difference in the case of benching you can't bench and drink at the same time although many people try this right you actually can't bench and drink at the same time. 38:48 Those are exclusive acts. 38:50 Therefore, when you say let's bench that effectively brings to a conclusion your act of the is completed is done is done. 39:00 Therefore again if you want to drink you have to go ahead and you have to go ahead and make a new however again say active there can be simultaneity between simultaneity you could check with one hand cover with the other 39:24 hand and therefore again because there can be simultaneity therefore the act of kisui does not create the heik and therefore again you go ahead and you shack you the animal you the animal you go ahead and cover the blood of 39:38 let's say she the cover the blood and you do not require a second on that then I will say now for our purposes it's somewhat academic because the pas that you get engaged in one act of kay for both and 39:53 so for our purposes there's no difference between 100 behemoths or a mixture of kay One act of could suffice for many. 40:04 There's a brisk this morning. 40:06 So, we just have to quickly, if we all work together, we could just rearrange the room quickly for the bris. 40:11 Yonison, tell us what to do.
Expand transcript 4,829 words